The integrated DecisionDx-SCC test result combines the 40-gene expression profile with clinicopathologic risk factors and optimized nested predictive models to deliver refined risk-assessment across 4 result classes.
Test ordered
Biopsy from a patient with high-risk cutaneous SCC
Optimized nested predictive models
The i40-GEP
Gene expression algorithm
The molecular signature is based on 40 genes
+
Clinicopathologic factors
Immunosuppression, tumor diameter, differentiation, PNI, and anatomic site
Integrated into a single, validated risk classification.
Four risk classes
Class 1A
Low risk
Class 1B
Moderate risk
Class 2A
High risk
Class 2B
Highest risk
Test ordered
Biopsy from a patient with high-risk cutaneous SCC
Optimized nested predictive models
The i40-GEP
Gene expression algorithm
The molecular signature is based on 40 genes
+
Clinicopathologic factors
Immunosuppression, tumor diameter, differentiation, PNI, and anatomic site
Integrated into a single, validated risk classification.
Four risk classes
Class 1A
Low risk
Class 1B
Moderate risk
Class 2A
High risk
Class 2B
Highest risk
DecisionDx-SCC testing process
DecisionDx-SCC is performed in Castle Biosciences’ CLIA certified, CAP-accredited and NY state approved laboratory using formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded (FFPE) primary tumor tissue from either a biopsy or excision.
Tissue blocks or slides from the primary tumor tissue biopsies are sent to our laboratory for testing.
RNA/DNA preparation
Once tissue is received in our laboratory, RNA is isolated from the tissue and converted to cDNA. The cDNA for each of the 40 genes is amplified and the gene signature recorded.
Signature interpretation
By combining the 40-gene expression profile with clinicopathologic risk factors and optimized nested predictive models a class result is provided.
DecisionDx-SCC reporting
The integrated DecisionDx-SCC report provides a class result based on a patient’s risk for metastasis and local recurrence:
PNI, poor differentiation, immunosuppression, tumor diameter and tumor location
i40-GEP result (MFS on validation cohort)
Clinical utility Based on metastatic risk
Class 1A
Low risk
MFS 97.3% | LRFS 96.8%
ART benefit
Low likelihood
0–5% metastatic risk
Safe to defer imaging
Safe to defer ART
Class 1B
Moderate risk
MFS 94.6% | LRFS 90.0%
ART benefit
Low likelihood
5–10% metastatic risk
Consider increased surveillance
Consider imaging
Safe to defer ART
Class 2A
High risk
MFS 77.9% | LRFS 83.1%
ART benefit
Low likelihood
>20% metastatic risk
Recommend increased surveillance
Recommend imaging
Recommend multidisciplinary consult
Unlikely benefit from ART
Class 2B
Highest risk
MFS 66.2% | LRFS 82.1%
ART benefit
High likelihood
>20% metastatic risk
Recommend increased surveillance
Recommend imaging
Recommend multidisciplinary consult
Likely benefit from ART
40-GEP
+
PNI, poor differentiation, immunosuppression, tumor diameter and tumor location
i40-GEP result (MFS on validation cohort)
Clinical utility Based on metastatic risk
Class 1A
Low risk
MFS 97.3% | LRFS 96.8%
ART benefit
Low likelihood
0–5% metastatic risk
Safe to defer imaging
Safe to defer ART
Class 1B
Moderate risk
MFS 94.6% | LRFS 90.0%
ART benefit
Low likelihood
5–10% metastatic risk
Consider increased surveillance
Consider imaging
Safe to defer ART
Class 2A
High risk
MFS 77.9% | LRFS 83.1%
ART benefit
Low likelihood
>20% metastatic risk
Recommend increased surveillance
Recommend imaging
Recommend multidisciplinary consult
Unlikely benefit from ART
Class 2B
Highest risk
MFS 66.2% | LRFS 82.1%
ART benefit
High likelihood
>20% metastatic risk
Recommend increased surveillance
Recommend imaging
Recommend multidisciplinary consult
Likely benefit from ART
40-GEP
+
PNI, poor differentiation, immunosuppression, tumor diameter and tumor location
i40-GEP result (MFS on validation cohort)
Clinical utility Based on metastatic risk
Class 1A
Low risk
MFS 97.3% | LRFS 96.8%
ART benefit
Low likelihood
0–5% metastatic risk
Safe to defer imaging
Safe to defer ART
Class 1B
Moderate risk
MFS 94.6% | LRFS 90.0%
ART benefit
Low likelihood
5–10% metastatic risk
Consider increased surveillance
Consider imaging
Safe to defer ART
Class 2A
High risk
MFS 77.9% | LRFS 83.1%
ART benefit
Low likelihood
>20% metastatic risk
Recommend increased surveillance
Recommend imaging
Recommend multidisciplinary consult
Unlikely benefit from ART
Class 2B
Highest risk
MFS 66.2% | LRFS 82.1%
ART benefit
High likelihood
>20% metastatic risk
Recommend increased surveillance
Recommend imaging
Recommend multidisciplinary consult
Likely benefit from ART
References: Ratner et al, AAD Innovation Academy 2026, Shah M, et al. J of Skin. 2025, Patel VA, et al. Cancer Med. 2022, Rentroia-Pacheco B, et al.eClinicalMedicine. 2023, Gupta N, et al. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2022, Wang DM, et al. JAMA Dermatol. 2025. *Report distribution experienced in validation.